Study links parental stress and children's risk of developing asthma


Children with stressed out parents may be more susceptible to developing asthma associated with environmental triggers such as high levels of traffic-related pollution and tobacco smoke, according to a new study led by researchers at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC).

According to the study that appears this week in the Online Early Edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the risk of asthma associated with traffic-related pollution was significantly higher for children of parents reporting high levels of stress. Stress, as well as low parental education, was also associated with larger effects of exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy.

“We found that it was children exposed to the combination of air pollution and life in a stressful environment who were at highest risk of developing asthma,” says principal investigator Rob McConnell, M.D., professor of preventive medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC and Deputy Director of the Children’s Environmental Health Center at USC.

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood illness in developed countries and has been linked to environmental factors. The study drew upon data from the USC Children’s Health Study, a longitudinal study of respiratory health among children in 13 southern California communities.

Researchers followed 2,497 children with no history of respiratory problems over three years, tracking whether they developed asthma starting in kindergarten or first grade. They also measured parental stress and parental education—as an indicator of socioeconomic status—using a questionnaire, and collected information on exposure to traffic-related pollution and whether the children had been exposed to tobacco smoke in utero.

The results showed that parental stress alone did not increase the risk that children would develop asthma. However, when children had a combination of parents with stressful lives and also lived near high levels of traffic-related pollution, their risk of asthma increased compared with children only exposed to pollution.

“Air pollution can promote inflammatory responses in the airways of the lung, which is a central feature of asthma,” McConnell says. “Stress may also have pro-inflammatory effects and this may help explain why the two exposures together were important.”

 Children whose parents perceived their lives as unpredictable, uncontrollable, or overwhelming were susceptible to the effects of pollution, the authors noted. Stress associated with poverty may help explain why asthma rates are often higher in lower socioeconomic status communities.

“Childhood asthma is a complex disease that probably has many contributing causes,” McConnell says. “Further study of effects of exposure to air pollution in combination with stressful environments associated with poverty and other social factors could contribute to our understanding of why the disease develops.”

The study was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the National Cancer Institute, the Hastings Foundation and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

?Parental stress increases the effect of traffic-related air pollution on childhood asthma incidence.? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0812910106 (K. Shankardass, Rob McConnell, M. Jerrett, J. Milam, J. Richardson, and K. Berhane.)

Information contained in this Articles page which doesn’t state it has been written by talkhealth, has been written by a third party, who has not paid to be on the talkhealth platform, and has been published with their permission. talkhealth cannot vouch for or verify any claims made by the author, and we do not endorse any specific products, brands, or treatments mentioned. The content in our Articles pages should not be considered a substitute for medical advice. You should always seek medical advice before changing your treatment routine.

Last revised: 27 November 2017
Next review: 27 November 2020